Nursing Students' and Nurse Preceptors' Perspectives of an Ambulatory Dedicated Education Unit in Primary Care and General Internal Medicine.

BACKGROUND: The sustainability of prelicensure nursing clinical learning models within ambulatory care is dependent on strong partnership and the availability of ambulatory nurse preceptors. Evaluation of preceptor and student satisfaction with ambulatory clinical experiences is necessary to identify program strengths and opportunities. METHOD: Nursing students' and nurse preceptors' perceptions of an ambulatory dedicated education unit (DEU) in primary care and general internal medicine practices were measured from 2021 to 2023. RESULTS: Students' survey responses indicated a high level of agreement for 20 (90.9%) of 22 items in 2021, 35 (100%) of 35 items in 2022, and 32 (91.4%) of 35 items in 2023. Preceptor responses demonstrated favorable agreement with all of the work-life satisfaction across the 3 years of the survey, with the exception of one question on the 2021 survey. CONCLUSION: Nursing students and staff nurse preceptors found the ambulatory DEU teaching and learning experience to be positive and satisfying. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(3):171-177.].

Development and Validation of a Universal Science Writing Rubric That is Applicable to Diverse Genres of Science Writing.

It is critical for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students to develop competencies in science communication, including science writing. However, it can be difficult for instructors and departments to assess the quality of their students' science writing. Many published science writing rubrics are specific to certain genres like lab reports. We thus developed a Universal Science Writing Rubric (USWR) that is usable regardless of the genre or audience of science writing. This tool enables students, instructors, and departments to assess science writing written to lay or scientific audiences, focusing on important rhetorical concerns like science content and interpretation rather than simply surface features like grammar. We demonstrate the use of our USWR on various life science lab reports, scientific review articles, grant proposals, and news articles, showing that the USWR is sensitive enough to highlight statistically significant differences between groups of student writing samples and valid enough to produce results that echo published and anecdotal observations of STEM student science writing skills. Thus, the USWR is a useful tool for assessment of STEM student science writing that is widely applicable in the classroom and laboratory.

Evaluation of the immunoglobulin G avidity test for diagnosis of toxoplasmic lymphadenopathy.

Toxoplasmic lymphadenopathy (TL) is the most common clinical manifestation of acute acquired toxoplasma infection in normal individuals. The diagnosis is established by serologic methods and lymph node biopsy. Recently, tests for avidity of toxoplasma immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies have been introduced to help discriminate between recently acquired and distant infection with the parasite. We studied an avidity test to define the usefulness of this method and to determine the evolution of the IgG avidity in TL. Seventy-three consecutive patients diagnosed as having TL were studied. IgG avidity test titers were noted to be time dependent from the clinical onset of lymphadenopathy. Low IgG avidity test results were observed in patients who had developed lymphadenopathy from <1 month to 17 months prior to the sampling of sera, emphasizing that low IgG avidity test results are not reliable for diagnosis of recently acquired infection. In contrast, high IgG avidity test results were observed only in patients who had developed lymphadenopathy at least 4 months earlier. Thus, a high IgG avidity test result in an individual who has recent onset of lymphadenopathy (e.g., within 2 to 3 months of sera sampling) suggests a cause other than toxoplasmosis. In such cases, further workup is warranted in order to determine the cause of the lymphadenopathy.

Patient preferences regarding antiretroviral therapy.

Antiretroviral medications for HIV infection can be combined into dozens of recommended regimens. However, little is known about patient preferences regarding antiretroviral therapy. We assessed the impact of clinician-mutable adherence barriers by conducting four patient focus groups (two English and two Spanish) consisting of 30 patients that focused discussion on antiretroviral treatment preferences. We also surveyed antiretroviral treatment preference from 31 subjects using the method of paired comparisons in which subjects indicated their preferences of regimen potency, pill burden, inconvenience, and side-effects using a 10-point rating scale. We found that most patients would tolerate severe side-effects, inconvenience, and large pill burden to have a potent antiretroviral regimen. In our population, patients generally preferred regimens with fewer side-effects to those with less inconvenience. Pill burden was of least importance among the domains studied. These preferences should be considered when selecting a regimen and developing interventions to improve antiretroviral adherence and patient outcomes.